Inicio > Cardiología > Factores de riesgo ateroscleróticos más frecuentes según los resultados de la Gammagrafía Tomográfica de Perfusión Miocárdica (GTPM) > Página 4

Factores de riesgo ateroscleróticos más frecuentes según los resultados de la Gammagrafía Tomográfica de Perfusión Miocárdica (GTPM)

resultados negativos y por tanto que no aportarían datos significativos a la estratificación de riesgo y conducta a seguir con el paciente.

CONCLUSIONES: La Hipertensión Arterial es el Factor de Riesgo Aterosclerótico (FRA) de mayor frecuencia en los pacientes que acuden a realizarse GTPM, independientemente del resultado de la misma. El FRA con mayor riesgo (y el único significativo) de GTPM+, fue Maduro, la GTPM es útil como test seleccionador de los pacientes tributarios de coronariografía, aun en presencia del Factor de Riesgo Aterosclerótico (FRA) que mayor riesgo presentó.

BIBLIOGRAFÍA.

  1. Mayo Clinic Cardiovascular Working Group on Stress Testing. Cardiovascular stress testing: a description of the various types of stress tests and indications for their use. Mayo Clin Proc. 1996 Jan;71(1):43-52.
  2. Nasr G, Sliem H. Silent myocardial ischemia in prediabetics in relation to insulin resistance. J Cardiovasc Dis Res. 2010 Jul;1(3):116-21.
  3. Ellemdin S, Soma P. The positive predictive value of myocardial perfusion imaging in screening patients for suspected coronary artery disease. Cardiovasc J S Afr. 2007 Jan-Feb;18(1):36-8.
  4. Ruilope LM. Current challenges in the clinical management of hypertension. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2011 Oct 25.
  5. Svartberg J, Jorde R. Endogenous testosterone levels and smoking in men. The fifth Tromsø study. Int J Androl. 2007 Jun;30(3):137-43.
  6. Carvalho VO, Guimarães GV, Ciolac EG, Bocchi EA. Heart Rate Dynamics During A Treadmill Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test in Optimized Beta-Blocked Heart Failure Patients. Clinics. 2008 Aug;63(4):479-82.
  7. Yannoutsos A, Mourad JJ, Blacher J, Safar M. [Hypertension and cardiovascular risk: the J-curve concept]. Praxis (Bern 1994). 2010 Nov 3;99(22):1335-41.
  8. Kostkiewicz M, Szot W. The prognostic value of normal myocardial perfusion SPECT with positivecoronary angiography. Nucl Med Rev Cent East Eur. 2012 Apr 24;15(1):22-5.
  9. Supariwala A, Uretsky S, Depuey EG, Thotakura G, Kanneganti S,Guriginjakunta N, Vala R, Kuruba M, Rozanski A. Influence of mode of stress and coronary risk factor burden uponlong-termmortality following normal stress myocardial perfusion single-photonemissioncomputed tomographic imaging. Am J Cardiol. 2013 Mar 15;111(6):846-50.
  10. Jacqueminet S, Barthelemy O, Rouzet F, Isnard R, Halbron M, Bouzamondo A, Le Guludec D, Grimaldi A, Metzger JP, Le Feuvre C. A randomized study comparing isotope and echocardiography stress testing in the screening of silent myocardial ischaemia in type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes Metab. 2010 Dec;36(6 Pt 1):463-9.
  11. Bax JJ, van der Wall EE.The prognostic value of myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with coronary artery disease. Rev Port Cardiol 2000 Feb;19 Suppl 1:I71-8.
  12. Udelson JE. Cardiología Nuclear. En: Braunwald Eugene. Tratado de Cardiología. 7ed. Madrid: Gea Consultoría Editorial,2006:287-333.
  13. Gorenberg M, Marmor A. Assessment of a new non-invasive index of cardiac performance for detection of dobutamine-induced myocardial ischemia. Isr Med Assoc J. 2007 Apr;9(4):286-9.
  14. Tamaki N, Morita K. SPET in cardiology. Diagnosis, prognosis, and management of patients with coronary artery disease. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2005 Jun;49(2):193-203.
  15. Høilund-Carlsen PF, Johansen A, Christensen HW, Vach W, Møldrup M, Bartram P, Veje A, Haghfelt T. Potential impact of myocardial perfusion scintigraphy as gatekeeper for invasive examination and treatment in patients with stable angina pectoris: observational study without post-test referral bias. Eur Heart J. 2006;27:29-34.
  16. Diederichsen AC, Sand NP, Nørgaard B, Lambrechtsen J, Jensen JM, Munkholm H, AzizA, Gerke O, Egstrup K, Larsen ML, Petersen H, Høilund-Carlsen PF, Mickley H.Discrepancy between coronary artery calcium score and HeartScore in middle-agedDanes: the DanRisk study.Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2011 Apr 27.
  17. Muzzarelli S, Pfisterer ME, Müller-Brand J, Zellweger MJ. Gate-keeper to coronary angiography: comparison of exercise testing, myocardial perfusion SPECT and individually tailored approach for risk stratification. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010 Apr 22.
  18. Høilund-Carlsen PF, Johansen A, Vach W, Christensen HW, Moldrup M, Haghfelt T. High probability of disease in angina pectoris patients: is clinical estimation reliable? Can J Cardiol. 2007;23:641-7.
  19. Høilund-Carlsen PF, Johansen A, Vach W, Christensen HW, Møldrup M, Haghfelt T.How well does standard clinician evaluation identify low likelihood of ischaemic or coronary heart disease? Int J Cardiol. 2008 Jan 11;123(2):177-9.
  20. Schaeffer MW, Brennan TD, Hughes JA, Gibler WB, Gerson MC. Resting radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging in a chest pain center including an overnight delayed image acquisition protocol. J Nucl Med Technol. 2007 Dec;35(4):242-5.
  21. Christensen HW, Haghfelt T, Vach W, Johansen A, Høilund-Carlsen PF. Observer reproducibility and validity of systems for clinical classification of angina pectoris: comparison with radionuclide imaging and coronary angiography. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2006;26:26-31.
  22. Del Val Gómez M, San Martín MA, Gallardo FG, Frías M, Peraira R, García A, Terol I. [Hyperemic reactivity scintigraphy in endothelial function]. Rev Esp Med Nucl. 2006 Nov-Dec;25(6):367-73.
  23. Soman P, Dave DM, Udelson JE, Han H, Ouda HZ, Patel AR, Karas RH, Kuvin JT. Vascular endothelial dysfunction is associated with reversible myocardial perfusion defects in the absence of obstructive coronary artery disease. J Nucl Cardiol. 2006;13:756-60.
  24. Acampa W, Spinelli L, Petretta M, De Lauro F, Ibello F, Cuocolo A. Prognostic value of myocardial ischemia in patients with uncomplicated acute myocardial infarction: direct comparison of stress echocardiography and myocardial perfusion imaging. J Nucl Med. 2005;46:417-23.
  25. Coma-Canella I, Martinez-Caro D, Cosin-Sales J, Fernandez-Jarne E, Garcia Velloso MJ, Giménez M. Clandestine ischemia in patients with vasospastic angina. Coron Artery Dis. 2000;11:383-90.
  26. Adamu U, Knollmann D, Almutairi B, Alrawashdeh W, Deserno V, Vogt F, Kleinhans E, Schäfer WM, Hoffmann R. Stress/rest myocardial perfusion scintigraphy in patients without significant coronary artery disease. J Nucl Cardiol. 2010 Jan-Feb;17(1):38-44.
  27. Beller GA, Heede RC. SPECT Imaging for Detecting Coronary Artery Disease and Determining Prognosis by Noninvasive Assessment of Myocardial Perfusion and Myocardial Viability. J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2011 Jul 6.
  28. Cerci MS, Cerci JJ, Cerci RJ, Cunha Pereira Neto C, Trindade E, Delbeke D, Pereira da Cunha CL, Vitola JV. Myocardial perfusion imaging is a strong predictor of death in women. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011 Aug;4(8):880-8.
  29. Doukky R, Frogge N, Balakrishnan G, Hayes K, Collado FM, Rangel MO,Trohman RG,Hendel RC. The prognostic value of cardiac SPECT performed at the primary carephysician’s office. J Nucl Cardiol.
Páginas: 1 2 3 4 5