Calcificaciones vistas por resonancia magnética.
Prótesis de mamas vistas por resonancia magnética.
Bibliografía.
1. Invasive breast cancer. Nucl Med Commun 2004;25(3):227-32. Mandelblatt JS, Cronin KA, Bailey S, et al. Effects of mammography screening under different screening schedules: model estimates of potential benefits and harms. Annals of Internal Medicine 2009;151(10):738-747.
2. Pisano ED, Gatsonis C, Hendrick E, et al. Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening. New England Journal of Medicine 2005; 353(17):1773-1783.
3. Donoso E, Cuello M. Mortalidad por cáncer en la mujer chilena. Análisis comparativo entre los años 1997 y 2003. Rev Chil Obstet Ginecol 2006;71(1): 10-6.
4. American College of Radiology (ACR) Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (Bi-RadsTM). Fourth Edition. Reston (VA):American College of Radiology; 2003.
5 Yunus M, Ahmed N, Masroor I, Yaqoob J. Mammographic criteria for determining the diagnostic value of microcalcifications in the detection of early breast cancer. J Pak Med Assoc 2004;54(1):24-9.
6. Gulsun M, Demirkazik FB, Ariyurek M. Evaluation of breast microcalcifications according to Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System criteria and Le Gal’s classification. Eur J Radiol 2003;47(3):227-31.
7. Donoso E, Cuello M. Mortalidad por cáncer en la mujer chilena. Análisis comparativo entre los años 1997 y 2003. Rev Chil Obstet Ginecol 2006;71(1): 10
8. Gallegos Hernandez JF, Tanis PJ, Deurloo EE, Nieweg OE, Rutgers EJ, Kroon BB, et al. Radio-guided surgery improves outcome of therapeutic excision in non-palpable.